Is Bitcoin "NO difference"?
If you want to be a hard currency that is generally circulated as a currency, then it must be indifferent. It is not important that you have done this thing, as long as it is still this thing, then it is worth the money._DJMINER
For example, if you have a piece of gold or a dollar bill in your hand, do you buy it or buy AK47, buy something that you should buy or not, as long as it appears in front of you in the normal state, then it is worth Ten thousand is still worth 10,000. It won’t be worth the money because it was used to buy anything that shouldn’t be bought. It’s branded, right?
But Bitcoin seems to have encountered this problem at the moment. A few days ago I saw Coindesk's headline: "The US Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned three Chinese citizens and their cryptocurrency addresses, saying they violated money laundering and drug smuggling laws."
They also announced the "criminal" Bitcoin and Litecoin addresses.
I think that bitcoin should soon have a big discussion too, that is, all bitcoins are "indiscriminate", or bitcoin with addresses that have been badly abused is "not clean."
There may even be a fork in it, is Bitcoin's anonymity and privacy more powerful, or is it as slowly accepted as it is now?
In fact, bitcoin's "monitoring address" has become more and more, and many addresses have been "marked" in some regulatory agencies or places like the FBI, becoming their tag address. Of course, some means, such as washing coins, can solve some problems, but after all, things that are done through technical means may also be solved by anti-technical means. In other words, can you guarantee that everyone knows if their currency is being tagged, does it need to be washed?
So many people are saying that bitcoin needs more anonymity, including the need to have the "Fungibility" that everyone often says, that is, interchangeability. If there is a tagged address and the marked bitcoin, then these bitcoins are not the same as everyone's clean bitcoin, so that all bitcoins are not "indiscriminate."_DJMINER
In fact, the currency circle often encounters such problems. For example, one thing that EOS sensationalized the currency circle last year was to freeze a hacker's EOS account. To put it simply, a hacker attacked a dapp, got a lot of eos, and finally, under the leadership of the organization (forgot the name), the community decided to freeze his account. In other words, this case and the subsequent cases of frozen accounts show that EOS is not indistinguishable.
Bitcoin's current anonymity and non-discrimination are still quite good. Although there are still many people who are committed to the development of anonymous coins, anonymous coins are weaker than bitcoin in ease of use. To a lesser extent than Bitcoin, it is still not a substitute for Bitcoin's current position in cryptocurrency.
To say that there is no difference in hard currency, in fact, the best has always been cash. That's why we often watch all kinds of police films and crime films. The best trading tools are a box of dollars, or a few boxes of dollars. When I was watching this kind of movie when I was young, I often wondered why they didn’t use bank transfer directly. Later, when I grew up, I realized that bank transfer is not stupid waiting to be arrested.
In fact, when Bitcoin was first used for crime, and the massive outbreak of the crime "wanna cry" understood by the public:
In the past decade, Bitcoin has been proven numerous times that it can be used for crime and will certainly be used for crime. Is there any difference between Bitcoin that has been touched by bitcoin addresses related to criminal activities and Bitcoin that has not been touched?
Before Bitcoin, which is the current world currency, the dollar is completely indistinguishable. Don't say that crimes like to use dollars, even if you fight with the US to buy weapons, the dollar is no problem, there is no difference. This is also why the dollar can always be the world currency until today.
So bitcoin needs no more anonymity to ensure that Bitcoin is truly "no difference"? I believe that Bitcoin will face a big discussion of this issue after the big discussion in the big block._DJMINER
For example, if you have a piece of gold or a dollar bill in your hand, do you buy it or buy AK47, buy something that you should buy or not, as long as it appears in front of you in the normal state, then it is worth Ten thousand is still worth 10,000. It won’t be worth the money because it was used to buy anything that shouldn’t be bought. It’s branded, right?
But Bitcoin seems to have encountered this problem at the moment. A few days ago I saw Coindesk's headline: "The US Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned three Chinese citizens and their cryptocurrency addresses, saying they violated money laundering and drug smuggling laws."
They also announced the "criminal" Bitcoin and Litecoin addresses.
I think that bitcoin should soon have a big discussion too, that is, all bitcoins are "indiscriminate", or bitcoin with addresses that have been badly abused is "not clean."
There may even be a fork in it, is Bitcoin's anonymity and privacy more powerful, or is it as slowly accepted as it is now?
In fact, bitcoin's "monitoring address" has become more and more, and many addresses have been "marked" in some regulatory agencies or places like the FBI, becoming their tag address. Of course, some means, such as washing coins, can solve some problems, but after all, things that are done through technical means may also be solved by anti-technical means. In other words, can you guarantee that everyone knows if their currency is being tagged, does it need to be washed?
So many people are saying that bitcoin needs more anonymity, including the need to have the "Fungibility" that everyone often says, that is, interchangeability. If there is a tagged address and the marked bitcoin, then these bitcoins are not the same as everyone's clean bitcoin, so that all bitcoins are not "indiscriminate."_DJMINER
In fact, the currency circle often encounters such problems. For example, one thing that EOS sensationalized the currency circle last year was to freeze a hacker's EOS account. To put it simply, a hacker attacked a dapp, got a lot of eos, and finally, under the leadership of the organization (forgot the name), the community decided to freeze his account. In other words, this case and the subsequent cases of frozen accounts show that EOS is not indistinguishable.
Bitcoin's current anonymity and non-discrimination are still quite good. Although there are still many people who are committed to the development of anonymous coins, anonymous coins are weaker than bitcoin in ease of use. To a lesser extent than Bitcoin, it is still not a substitute for Bitcoin's current position in cryptocurrency.
To say that there is no difference in hard currency, in fact, the best has always been cash. That's why we often watch all kinds of police films and crime films. The best trading tools are a box of dollars, or a few boxes of dollars. When I was watching this kind of movie when I was young, I often wondered why they didn’t use bank transfer directly. Later, when I grew up, I realized that bank transfer is not stupid waiting to be arrested.
In fact, when Bitcoin was first used for crime, and the massive outbreak of the crime "wanna cry" understood by the public:
In the past decade, Bitcoin has been proven numerous times that it can be used for crime and will certainly be used for crime. Is there any difference between Bitcoin that has been touched by bitcoin addresses related to criminal activities and Bitcoin that has not been touched?
Before Bitcoin, which is the current world currency, the dollar is completely indistinguishable. Don't say that crimes like to use dollars, even if you fight with the US to buy weapons, the dollar is no problem, there is no difference. This is also why the dollar can always be the world currency until today.
So bitcoin needs no more anonymity to ensure that Bitcoin is truly "no difference"? I believe that Bitcoin will face a big discussion of this issue after the big discussion in the big block._DJMINER
评论
发表评论